I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-577/19) (*)
(European Union trade mark - Revocation proceedings - European Union word mark Leinfelder - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Abuse of rights)
(2020/C 255/21)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Lüft, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Thomas Schafft (Munich) (represented by: V. Sandulache, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 May 2019 (Joined Cases R 1930/2018 2 and R 1937/2018 2), concerning revocation proceedings between Mr Schafft and Leinfelder Uhren München.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German
ECLI:EU:C:2020:255
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.