- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-147/19: Order of the General Court of 14 November 2019 — Flovax v EUIPO — Dagniaux and Gervais Danone (GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923) (EU trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Application for European Union figurative mark GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923 — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0147
62019TB0147
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 19/50
(Case T-147/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Application for European Union figurative mark GLACIER DAGNIAUX DEPUIS 1923 - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 19/61)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Flovax Sàrl (Doncols, Luxembourg) (represented by: C.-S. Marchiani, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Pétrequin and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Dagniaux (Roubaix, France)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Compagnie Gervais Danone (Paris, France) (represented by: S. Havard Duclos, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 May 2018 (Joined Cases R 2210/2016-1 and R 2211/2016-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between, on the one hand, Compagnie Gervais Danone and, on the other hand, Flovax and Dagniaux.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
* * *