- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-495/18: Action brought on 17 August 2018 — Dermatest v EUIPO (DERMATEST)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0495
62018TN0495
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 352/44
(Case T-495/18)
(2018/C 352/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DERMATEST’ — Application for registration No 17 542 986
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 in Case R 426/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.