- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-21/12: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Alfacam and Others v Parliament (Action for annulment — Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Supply of audiovisual services to the Parliament — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Articles 94 and 103 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) no 1605/2002 — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0021
62012TB0021
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/22
(Case T-21/12)(Action for annulment - Public service contracts - Procurement procedure - Supply of audiovisual services to the Parliament - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Articles 94 and 103 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) no 1605/2002 - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
2013/C 71/34
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Alfacam (Lint, Belgium); Via Storia (Schiltigheim, France); DB Video Productions (Aartselaar, Belgium); IEC (Rennes, France) and European Broadcast Partners (Eubropa) (Aartselaar) (represented by: B. Pierart, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: P. López-Carceller and C. Braunstein, and subsequently by: P. López-Carceller and G. Hellinckx, acting as Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 18 November 2011 to award lot No 1 in the call for tenders EP/DGCOMM/AV/11/11 relating to the provision of audiovisual services within the Parliament in Brussels (Belgium) to watch tv and of the Parliament’s decision of 18 November 2011 rejecting Eubropa’s bid for that lot.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.
* Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.