I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 038/94)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Applicant: BMB sp. z o.o. (Grójec, Poland) (represented by: K. Czubkowski, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ferrero (Alba, Italy)
Proprietor of the design at issue: The applicant
Design at issue: Community design No 826 680-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2015 in Case R 1150/2012-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision.
—Breach of Article 61(1) and (2) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Breach of Articles 62 and 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Breach of Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.