- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-830/16: Action brought on 23 November 2016 — Monolith Frost v EUIPO — Dovgan (PLOMBIR)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0830
62016TN0830
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 22/56
(Case T-830/16)
(2017/C 022/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Monolith Frost GmbH (Leopoldshöhe, Germany) (represented by: E. Liebich and S. Labesius, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dovgan GmbH (Hamburg, Germany)
Details of the procedure before EUIPO
Proprietor of the mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘PLOMBIR’
Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 in Case R 1812/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision pursuant to Article 65(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—infringement of the obligation to state reasons under the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.