EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-54/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 July 2012 — BG v European Ombudsman (Civil service — Disciplinary measure — Disciplinary sanction — Removal from post — Existence of a preliminary investigation before the national criminal courts at the time of adoption of the decision to remove the applicant from her post — Equal treatment for men and women — Prohibition of the dismissal of a pregnant worker during the period from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of maternity leave)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FA0054

62011FA0054

July 17, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.2.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/29

(Case F-54/11)(<span class="super">1</span>)

(Civil service - Disciplinary measure - Disciplinary sanction - Removal from post - Existence of a preliminary investigation before the national criminal courts at the time of adoption of the decision to remove the applicant from her post - Equal treatment for men and women - Prohibition of the dismissal of a pregnant worker during the period from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of maternity leave)

2013/C 46/55

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: BG (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Ombudsman (represented by: J. Sant’Anna, Agent, D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision to apply to the applicant the disciplinary measure of dismissal without loss of pension rights. Consequently, a claim, primarily, to restore the applicant to her post and, in the alternative, to grant her a sum corresponding to the remuneration which she would have received between the date of effect of the dismissal and the date at which she will reach retirement age. In any event, the grant of a sum to the applicant in respect of the non-material damage suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action brought by BG;

2.Orders BG to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Ombudsman.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 204, 9.7.2011, p. 30.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia