I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-661/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Action for annulment - Economic and monetary union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Setting of the 2016 ex-ante contribution - Period for bringing an action - Out of time - Plea of illegality - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2019/C 44/73)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Credito Fondiario SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, S. Frazzani, A. Neri and F. Iacovone, lawyers)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: B. Meyring, A. Villani and M. Caccialanza, lawyers)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, A. Steiblytė and K.-Ph. Wojcik, acting as Agents)
Application based, first, on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) and of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 20 May 2016 on the adjustment of the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund, supplementing the decision of the Board of 15 April 2016 (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/13), to the extent that they concern the applicant, and, second, on Article 277 TFEU.
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Credito Fondiario SpA is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Single Resolution Board (SRB).
3.The European Commission and the Italian Republic shall bear their own costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.