I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2009/C 267/124
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Philippe Connefroy (Le Rozel, France), Jean-Guy Gueguen (Carantec, France) and EARL de Cavagnan (Bouglon, France) (represented by: C. Galvez, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
—Annul the contested decision on the basis of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC;
—Order the Commission to pay all the costs.
The applicants seek the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 203 final of 28 January 2009 (1), by which the Commission had declared incompatible with the common market the State aid granted by the French Republic to fruit and vegetable producers in the context of ‘contingency plans’ aimed at facilitating the marketing of agricultural products harvested in France and had instructed the French Republic to recover the aid in question.
The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicants are identical or similar to those relied on in the context of Case T-243/09 Fedecom v Commission (2).
(1) OJ 2009 L 127, p. 11 — published under No 2009/402/EC.
(2) OJ 2009 C 205, p. 43.