EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-243/10: Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Rungis Express/HABM — Žito (MARESTO)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0243

62010TN0243

May 26, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/40

(Case T-243/10)

()

2010/C 234/73

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: RUNGIS Express AG (Meckenheim, Germany) (represented by: U. Feldmann, Rechtsanwalt)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ŽITO prehrambena industrija, d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Forms of order sought

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2010 in Case R 691/2009-1;

Dismiss the Defendant's opposition.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark MARESTO for goods in Class 29.

Proprietor of the marks cited in opposition: ŽITO prehrambena industrija, d.d.

Marks cited in opposition: National pictorial mark depicting a cook and including the word element M·A·E·S·T·R·O for goods in Classes 29 and 30, a national pictorial mark including the word element M•A•E•S•T•R•O for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 43, and the national word mark ‘BRAVO MAESTRO!’ for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 43.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1) (b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) on the ground that the marks cited in opposition lacked distinctive character and/or were purely descriptive.

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

* * *

Language of the case: German.

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia