- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-226/20: Action brought on 24 April 2020 — Steinel v EUIPO (MobileHeat)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0226
62020TN0226
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.6.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 201/53
(Case T-226/20)
(2020/C 201/67)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Steinel GmbH (Herzebrock-Clarholz, Germany) (represented by: M. Breuer and K. Freudenstein, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Registration of the EU word mark MobileHeat — Application for registration No 18 029 162
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2020 in Case R 2472/2019-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and Council.