- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-114/19: Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Pavel v EUIPO — bugatti (B)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0114
62019TN0114
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.6.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/39
(Case T-114/19)
(2019/C 213/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Dan-Gabriel Pavel (Oradea, Romania) (represented by: E. Nedelcu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: bugatti GmbH (Herford, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark B — European Union trade mark No 13 545 181
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 December 2018 in related Cases R 49/2018-1 and R 85/2018-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and maintain the trade mark EUTM-013545181 validly registered as it was registered on 05/05/2016 for all the goods and services;
—order EUIPO to pay the judicial costs.
Pleas in law
—Inapplicability of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Absence of proof concerning the breach of the public interest.