I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2017/C 006/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Applicant: Euro Castor Green (Bagnolet, France) (represented by: B. Lafont, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Netlon France (Saint Saulve, France)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: European Union design No 001 197 966-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11/08/2016 in Case R 754/2014-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that the application, and its annexes, are admissible;
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 5 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.