- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-303/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie — Poland) — Ultimo Portfolio Investment (Luxembourg) SA v KM (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Credit agreements for consumers — Directive 2008/48/EC — Risk of over-indebtedness — Article 8 — Creditor’s obligation to assess the consumer’s creditworthiness — Article 23 — Effective, proportionate and dissuasive nature of the penalty in the event of infringement of that obligation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0303
62020CA0303
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.7.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 297/14
(Case C-303/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Credit agreements for consumers - Directive 2008/48/EC - Risk of over-indebtedness - Article 8 - Creditor’s obligation to assess the consumer’s creditworthiness - Article 23 - Effective, proportionate and dissuasive nature of the penalty in the event of infringement of that obligation)
(2021/C 297/13)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ultimo Portfolio Investment (Luxembourg) SA
Defendant: KM
Operative part of the judgment
Article 23 of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that the examination of the effectiveness, proportionality and dissuasiveness of the penalties provided for in that provision, in the event, inter alia, of the failure to comply with the obligation to examine the creditworthiness of the consumer, laid down in Article 8 of that directive, must be carried out taking into account, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 288 TFEU, not only the provision adopted specifically in national law to transpose that directive, but also all the provisions of that law, interpreting them, so far as possible, in the light of the wording and objectives of that directive, so that those penalties meet the requirements laid down in Article 23 thereof.
(*) Language of the case: Polish.
* * *
(1) OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.