- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-835/19: Order of the General Court of 30 September 2020 — CrossFit v EUIPO — Hochwarter (CROSSBOX) (EU trade mark — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0835
62019TB0835
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 390/37
(Case T-835/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 390/54)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: CrossFit Inc. (Scotts Valley, California, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Marlis Hochwarter (Vienna, Austria)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 (Case R 1832/2018-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between CrossFit and Marlis Hochwarter.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by CrossFit Inc.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
* * *
(1) OJ C 36, 3.2.2020.