I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case C-618/20)
(2021/C 72/16)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicants: ZU and TV
Defendant: Ryanair Ltd
1.May a carrier that sells tickets through its own website for flights operated under the code of another airline be considered an operating air carrier for the purposes of Article 5(5) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) in respect of the specific flights it sells that are operated by another company?
2.May a carrier that sells tickets through its own website for flights operated under the code of another airline be considered an operating air carrier for the purposes of Article 5(5) of Regulation No 261/2004 in respect of the specific flights it sells that are operated by another company where the company that operates a flight is part of the corporate group of the company that sells tickets for that flight?
3.May the concept of contracting carrier in Article 45 of the Montreal Convention be equated with the concept of operating air carrier in Article 5(5) of Regulation No 261/2004?
4.May the concept of actual carrier referred to in Article 45 of the Montreal Convention be equated with the concept of operating air carrier in Article 5(5) of Regulation No 261/2004?
(1) Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
* * *