- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-18/21: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Be Smart v Commission (State aid — Complaint — Action for failure to act — Commission’s adoption of a position after the action was brought and which put an end to the failure to act — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0018
62021TB0018
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.10.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 431/37
(Case T-18/21) (*)
(State aid - Complaint - Action for failure to act - Commission’s adoption of a position after the action was brought and which put an end to the failure to act - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 431/45)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Be Smart Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Satta, G. Roberti, A. Romano and I. Perego, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission acted unlawfully by failing to define its position on the complaint made by the applicant on 15 October 2014 concerning alleged State aid measures granted by the Italian Republic to the interuniversity consortium Cineca.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Be Smart Srl.
(*)
Language of the case: Italian.
* * *
(1) OJ C 79, 8.3.2021.