I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-510/06 P)(1)
(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Sodium gluconate market - Fines - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Community competition policy - Equal treatment - Turnover to be taken into account - Attenuating circumstances)
2009/C 113/05
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Archer Daniels Midland Co. (represented by: M. Garcia, Solicitor)
Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Bouquet and X. Lewis, Agents)
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 27 September 2006 in Case T-329/01 Archer Daniels Midland Co. v Commission, by which the Court dismissed an action for annulment of Articles 1 and 3 of Commission Decision C(2001)2931 final of 2 October 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/36.756 — Sodium Gluconate) and, in the alternative, for a reduction in the fine imposed on the applicant
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Archer Daniels Midland Co. to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.