- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-669/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Novomatic v EUIPO — Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS — Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS — Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS — Relative ground for refusal — Damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0669
62019TA0669
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 378/32
(Case T-669/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS - Earlier EU word mark PRIMUS - Earlier Benelux word mark PRIMUS - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2020/C 378/39)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Novomatic AG (Gumpoldskirchen, Austria) (represented by: W. Mosing, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Brouwerij Haacht NV (Boortmeerbeek, Belgium) (represented by: G. Glas and E. Taelman, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 July 2019 (Case R 2528/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Brouwerij Haacht and Novomatic.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Novomatic AG to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.