- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-152/25: Action brought on 7 March 2025 – IA v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0152
62025TN0152
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/2231
22.4.2025
(Case T-152/25)
(C/2025/2231)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: IA (represented by: L. Levi and M. Itani, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present action to be admissible and well-founded;
—annul the decision set out in the applicant’s pay slip for June 2024 determining annual travel expenses based on the distance between his place of employment and his place of origin in Algiers (Algeria) only as from 2024 and not also in respect of the years 2014 to 2023;
—in so far as is necessary, annul the decision of 28 November 2024 rejecting the complaint;
—order the defendant to reimburse the applicant’s annual travel expenses based on the distance between his place of employment and his place of origin in respect of the years 2014 to 2023, that amount to be increased by default interest at the rate set by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-136/25, HV v EESC.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2231/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—