I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
18.3.2024
(Appeal - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Word mark tagesschau - Partial revocation - Representation by a lawyer - Independence requirement)
(C/2024/1998)
Language of the case: German
Appellant: bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH (represented by: T. Wendt, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Hanf and D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agents), Bayerischer Rundfunk, Hessischer Rundfunk, Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk, Norddeutscher Rundfunk, Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg, Saarländischer Rundfunk, Südwestrundfunk, Westdeutscher Rundfunk Köln, Radio Bremen (represented by: B. Krause, Rechtsanwältin)
Intervener in support of the other party: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 16 June 2022, bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau) (T-83/20, EU:T:2022:369).
2.Refers Case T-83/20 back to the General Court of the European Union.
3.Reserves the costs.
(1) OJ C 94, 13.03.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1998/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)