- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-173/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2019 by Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-890/16: Scandlines Danmark and Scandlines Deutschland v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0173
62019CN0173
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.4.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/34
—
(Case C-173/19 P)
(2019/C 148/32)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellants: Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland GmbH (represented by: L. Sandberg-Mørch, advokat)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Kingdom of Denmark
Form of order sought
The appellants claim that the Court should:
—Set aside the Order of 13 December 2018 of the General Court in Case T-890/16 to the extent that it contradicts the General Court’s judgment in Case T-630/15 as to the nature of the Commission Decision as a confirmatory measure regarding the additional construction measures.
—Order the respondent to pay its own costs and the costs of the appellants.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the application, the applicants rely on two pleas in law:
—First Plea: the General Court erred in law by adopting the contested order on the basis of a position which is entirely the opposite of that adopted in its judgment in Case T-630/15.
—Second Plea: the General Court erred in law by adopting the contested order with a statement of reasons that suffers from internal contradictions.
—