EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-361/16 P: Appeal brought on 29 June 2016 by Franmax UAB against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 April 2016 in Case T-21/15: Franmax v EUIPO — Ehrmann (DINO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0361
62016CN0361
June 29, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.3.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 78/6
(Case C-361/16 P)
(2017/C 078/08)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Franmax UAB (represented by: E. Saukalas, advokatas)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu
By order of 8 November 2016 the Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.