I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 112/63
Language in which the application was lodged: Lithuanian
Applicant: Research and Production Company MELT WATER UAB (Klaipėda, Lithuania) (represented by V. Viešūnaitė, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 November 2013 in Case R 481/2013-5 and order OHIM to register, as a Community trade mark, the mark consisting of the form of a bottle in respect of which the applicant, Research and Production Company MELT WATER UAB, has sought registration (application No 010 751 584);
—award costs in favour of the applicant, Research and Production Company MELT WATER UAB;
—order the defendant, OHIM, to produce the file concerning the action relating to that application for registration of a Community trade mark (application No 010 751 584).
Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant.
Community trade mark in respect of which registration is sought: a three-dimensional mark consisting of the form of a bottle, for goods in Class 32 — application No 010 751 584 for registration of a Community trade mark.
Decision of the Examiner: application rejected.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: Articles 4 and 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, together with the case-law of the European Union Courts.