- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-45/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2025 – UG v ERCEA (Civil service – Contract staff – Reports – Appraisal reports – 2021 appraisal period – Rule of correspondence – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0045
62023TA0045
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/1756
31.3.2025
(Case T-45/23)
(Civil service - Contract staff - Reports - Appraisal reports - 2021 appraisal period - Rule of correspondence - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality)
(C/2025/1756)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: UG (represented by: N. Flandin, lawyer)
Defendant: European Research Council Executive Agency (represented by: M. Pesquera Alonso, M. E. Chacón Mohedano, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
By her action pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the applicant claims that the Court should annul her 2021 appraisal report and, in the alternative, annul in part the report at issue in so far as it includes several comments in the sections headed ‘Efficiency’, ‘Ability’ and ‘Conduct in the service’, as well as the overall comment.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders UG to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C 127, 11.4.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1756/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—