- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-225/25, KORFIN and SEMPIOLA INVEST: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovakia) lodged on 24 March 2025 – KORFIN, s.r.o., and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED v SLOVNAFT, a.s.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0225
62025CN0225
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/3266
(Case C-225/25, KORFIN and SEMPIOLA INVEST)
(C/2025/3266)
Language of the case: Slovak
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants at first instance: KORFIN, s.r.o., and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED
Defendant at first instance: SLOVNAFT, a.s.
Question referred
Must Article 2(1)(a) of Directive 2004/25/EC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids be interpreted as meaning that a voluntary takeover bid can be made only if it has as its objective the acquisition of a controlling interest in the offeree company and, therefore, a voluntary takeover bid cannot be made by an entity which already has a controlling interest in the offeree company?
—
(1)
OJ 2004 L 142, p. 12.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3266/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—