EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-213/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 6 August 2024 – Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret v Commission (Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the European Union – Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Manifest inadmissibility of the main action – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TB0213

62024TB0213

August 6, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/5503

23.9.2024

(Case T-213/24 R)

(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the European Union - Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 - Manifest inadmissibility of the main action - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)

(C/2024/5503)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret AŞ (Kepez, Türkiye) (represented by: R. Antonini, E. Monard, B. Maniatis and E. Zachari, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Bruti Liberati, M. Carpus Carcea and B. Sasinowska, Agents)

Re:

By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of the email of the European Commission of 29 March 2024 by which, allegedly, the aircraft which it operates were subject to a landing, take-off and overflight ban pursuant to Articles 3d and 12 of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 229, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1.The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the Federal Republic of Germany’s application to intervene.

3.Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the Federal Republic of Germany’s application to intervene.

4.The costs are reserved as to the remainder.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5503/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: English

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia