- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-136/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 7 December 2015 — Probst v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Former parliamentary assistant — Commission’s decision to grant the expatriation allowance to former parliamentary assistants as of the date of publication of the information given to staff — Judgments annulling a measure — Substantial new facts — Limited temporal effect — Res judicata — Administrative decisions which have become final — Equal treatment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FB0136
62014FB0136
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.2.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 48/100
(Case F-136/14)(1)
((Civil service - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Former parliamentary assistant - Commission’s decision to grant the expatriation allowance to former parliamentary assistants as of the date of publication of the information given to staff - Judgments annulling a measure - Substantial new facts - Limited temporal effect - Res judicata - Administrative decisions which have become final - Equal treatment))
(2016/C 048/115)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Norbert Probst (Genval, Belgium) (represented by: D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Currall and T.S. Bohr, Agents, and subsequently T.S. Bohr, Agent)
Re:
Application by the applicant for annulment of the Commission’s decision granting him, with retrospective effect, the expatriation allowance, in so far as the retrospective effect extends merely to 1 September 2013, and the applicant claims that the Commission should grant him that allowance as of his recruitment by the Commission on 1 July 1999.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
2.Mr Probst shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(1) OJ C 34, 2.2.2015, p. 54.