I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
16.12.2024
(C/2024/7357)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: RGCC Holdings AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Campolini and V. Van der Wangen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Phiacademy Doo Beograd (Belgrade, Serbia)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark PHI GROUP – Application for registration No 18 722 371
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 July 2024 in Case R 137/2024-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—find that the opposition against the trade mark at issue fails in its entirety;
—in the alternative, refer the case to EUIPO in order to draw all the necessary consequences from the Court’s decision;
—order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
—order EUIPO and, if necessary, the intervener, to pay the costs of the present proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7357/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—