EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-333/23, Habonov: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gießen — Germany) — GM v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Independence of judges — Directive 2000/78/EC — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Interpretation necessary for the referring court to be able to give judgment — Absence — Manifest inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CB0333

62023CB0333

November 8, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/701

22.1.2024

(Case C-333/23, (*) Habonov (**) )

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Independence of judges - Directive 2000/78/EC - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - Interpretation necessary for the referring court to be able to give judgment - Absence - Manifest inadmissibility)

(C/2024/701)

Language of the case: German

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: GM

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Verwaltungsgericht Gießen (Administrative Court, Giessen, Germany), by decision of 19 May 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/701/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

*

Language of the case: German.

*

The name of the present case is fictitious. It is not the actual name of any party to the proceedings.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia