I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-747/14) (1)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 144/58)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz, A. Lambrecht and S. Cobet-Nüse, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 August 2014 (Case R 1880/2013-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Société des Produits Nestlé SA and Merck KGaA.
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Merck KGaA and Société des Produits Nestlé SA are ordered to bear their own costs and to, each, bear half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(1)
OJ C 462, 22.12.2014.