I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark GOTHA – Earlier Community figurative mark gotcha – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 February 2009 (Case R 657/2008-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Perry Ellis International Group Holdings, Ltd and Vidieffe Srl.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark GOTHA for goods in Classes 18 and 25 – Application No 3665957
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Perry Ellis International Group Holdings, Ltd
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Figurative Community trade mark gotcha (No 2896199) for goods in Classes 3, 18 and 25
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition dismissed in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal partially upheld
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 12 February 2009 (Case R 657/2008-1), in so far as it annuls the decision of the Opposition Division, inasmuch as that decision rejected the opposition, first, in respect of ‘[leather and imitations of leather] goods (not included in other classes); trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks’ in Class 18 and, second, in respect of all the goods in Class 25;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Vidieffe Srl.