- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-91/23: Action brought on 21 February 2023 — Ofree v EUIPO — Gamigo (gamindo)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0091
62023TN0091
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 121/17
(Case T-91/23)
(2023/C 121/23)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Ofree Srl (Treviso, Italy) (represented by: L. Sergi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gamigo AG (Hamburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark gamindo — Application for registration No 18 105 987
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 January 2023 in Case R 632/2022-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs incurred by the applicant for the purpose of the present proceedings before the Court and for the purpose of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU.