- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-91/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2019 — L v Parliament (Civil service — Accredited parliamentary assistants — Sick leave — Sick leave spent elsewhere than at the place of employment — Unauthorised absence — Article 60 of the Staff Regulations — Duty of care — Principle of good administration)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0091
62017TA0091
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.4.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 131/41
(Case T-91/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Sick leave - Sick leave spent elsewhere than at the place of employment - Unauthorised absence - Article 60 of the Staff Regulations - Duty of care - Principle of good administration)
(2019/C 131/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: L (represented by: I. Coutant Peyre, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch and Í. Ní Riagáin Düro, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of 31 August 2016 concerning unauthorised absences of the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders L to pay the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.