EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-252/10: Action brought on 28 May 2010 — Cross Czech v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0252

62010TN0252

May 28, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/51

(Case T-252/10)

()

2010/C 209/76

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Cross Czech a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: T. Schollaert, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul Commission Decision No INFSO-02/FD/GVC/Isc D (2010) 208676 of 12 March 2010; and

Order the Commission to pay the costs of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of its application, the applicant seeks, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the annulment of Commission Decision No INFSO-02/FD/GVC/Isc D (2010) 208676 of 12 March 2010, reference No 09-BA74-006, a letter confirming the findings of audit report B74-06 concerning the audit of the financial statements for the period from 1 February 2005 until 30 April 2008 for the projects eMapps.com, CEEC IST NET and TRANSFER EAST, concluded in the framework of the 6th EU Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (2002-2006).

In support of its submissions, the applicant puts forward the following pleas in law:

The applicant contends that the contested decision constitutes an infringement of the Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, as it:

is based on incorrect and insufficient fact finding by the Commission;

reflects the incorrect application of the contracts relating to the projects in question, in particular in respect of the finding that the applicant committed a breach of these contracts;

is based on manifest errors of assessment of the facts relating to the alleged breach of the contracts relating to these projects, resulting in a failure to comply with the necessary legal standards and thus in an error of law;

is based on defects of reasoning; and

constitutes a breach of the applicant’s procedural rights in the procedure preceding the issuing of the contested decision and a breach of the principle of due care.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia