I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 027/91)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Osho Lotus Commune e.V. (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Viefhues, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Osho International Foundation (Zurich, Switzerland)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘OSHO’ — Application for registration No 1 224 831
Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 September 2015 in Case R 1997/2014-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM and, where relevant, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (f) of Regulation No 207/2009.