I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-471/11) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Accession of new Member States - Transitional measures - Agricultural products - Sugar - Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 - Basis of assessment and rate applicable for the charge on surplus stocks)
(2012/C 331/16)
Language of the case: Latvian
Applicant: Cido Grupa SIA
Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Augstākās tiesas Senāts — Interpretation of Article 4(1) and 6(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 of 14 January 2004 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union (OJ 2004 L 9, p. 8) — Calculation of tax on surplus sugar stocks held by operators — Notions of ‘quantity in question’ and ‘product concerned’ in the case of sugar syrup
The third subparagraph of Article 6(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 of 14 January 2004 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1667/2005 of 13 October 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that the basis of assessment for the charge payable on a surplus stock of sugar syrup (CN code 2106 90 59) is the quantity of white sugar (CN code 1701 99 10) actually contained in that product and the rate of that charge is the rate of the import charge applicable to white sugar, increased by EUR 1,21/100 kg.
Language of the case: Latvian.