- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-422/22, Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy — Poland) — Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu v TE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Migrant workers — Social security — Legislation applicable — Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 — Articles 5, 6 and 16 — A1 certificate — Inaccuracy of the particulars — Withdrawal on the initiative of the issuing institution — Obligation for the issuing institution to initiate a dialogue and conciliation procedure with the competent authority of the host Member State — None)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0422
62022CA0422
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/521
(Case C-422/22, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Migrant workers - Social security - Legislation applicable - Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 - Articles 5, 6 and 16 - A1 certificate - Inaccuracy of the particulars - Withdrawal on the initiative of the issuing institution - Obligation for the issuing institution to initiate a dialogue and conciliation procedure with the competent authority of the host Member State - None)
(C/2024/521)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Toruniu
Defendant: TE
Operative part of the judgment
Articles 5, 6 and 16 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 must be interpreted as meaning that the institution that issued an A1 certificate which, following a review of its own motion of the evidence on which the issue of that certificate is based, finds that evidence to be incorrect, may withdraw that certificate without first initiating the dialogue and conciliation procedure laid down in Article 76(6) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation No 465/2012, with the competent institutions of the Member States concerned with a view to determining the national legislation applicable.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/521/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)