- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-751/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KL v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Sick leave — Rejection of medical certificates — Unjustified absences — Action for annulment and for damages)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0751
62020TA0751
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.10.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 418/21
(Case T-751/20) (*)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Sick leave - Rejection of medical certificates - Unjustified absences - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2022/C 418/26)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: KL (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and I. Zanin, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, lawyer)
Re:
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 18 May 2020 by which the European Investment Bank (EIB) rejected the medical certificates which he had produced to justify his absences from 18 March to 18 April and from 20 April to 20 May 2020 under Article 3.3 of Annex X to the EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB Staff Regulations, and, secondly, compensation for the damage he claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of 18 May 2020 by which the European Investment Bank (EIB) rejected the medical certificates produced by KL to justify his absences from 18 March to 18 April and from 20 April to 20 May 2020 under Article 3.3 of Annex X to the EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB Staff Regulations;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders the EIB to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.