- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-372/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland (Netherlands) lodged on 19 June 2017 — Vision Research Europe BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0372
62017CN0372
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.9.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 300/17
(Case C-372/17)
(2017/C 300/21)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Vision Research Europe BV
Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond
Question referred
Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 113/2014 of 4 February 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature valid if the Rechtbank is correct in its provisional view that subheading 8525 80 30 should be interpreted as meaning that the camera, as described in 2 and 12 above, which has a volatile memory whereby the images captured in the camera are lost when subsequent images are captured or when the camera is switched off, can be classified thereunder?
Language of the case: Dutch
* * *
(1) OJ 2014 L 38, p. 20.