EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-83/19: Action brought on 12 February 2019 — AL v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0083

62019TN0083

February 12, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/28

(Case T-83/19)

(2019/C 122/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: AL (represented by: A. Blot and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

declare the action admissible and well founded;

annul the decision implicitly rejecting the applicant’s claim for compensation submitted on 19 December 2017 and, if necessary, the decision of 12 November 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

compensate the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant;

order the defendant to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging breach of the defendant’s contractual commitments to the applicant, in that the Commission failed to comply with the undertaking it had given by appointing the applicant as the European Union facilitator for the Congo Basin Forests Partnership.

2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of respect for legitimate expectations.

3.Third plea in law, alleging breach of the right to be heard.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging breach of the principle of good administration and the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia