I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2010/C 148/78
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Grupo Osborne (El Puerto de Santa María, Spain) (represented by: J. Iglesias Monravá, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Confecciones Sanfertús, SL (Graus, Spain)
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) in Case R 0638/2009-2;
—Uphold the registration of the Community trade mark No 2 844 264 in Class 25, and
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Grupo Osborne.
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘TORO’ (registration application No 2 844 264) for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 39.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Confecciones Sanfertús, S.L.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish word mark ‘LETORO’ (No 465 635) for goods in Classes 24 and 25 and Spanish figurative marks containing the word ‘TORO’ (No 802 043 and No 1 513 622) for goods in Class 25.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld and application for registration refused.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark; the fact that there is a previous ruling by the Opposition Division which decides on the compatibility of the marks ‘TORO’ and ‘LETORO’; and the fact that the evidence of use presented does not prove the use of the Spanish marks ‘LETORO’ (word) and ‘TORO’ (figurative).