I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark VAPIX - Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Assessment of the evidence)
(C/2024/3771)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Sta Grupa AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: I. Stankeviča, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Axis AB (Lund, Sweden) (represented by: J. Norderyd, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 February 2023 (Case R 1098/2022-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Sta Grupa AS, in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay the costs incurred by Axis AB;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3771/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *