EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-680/24: Action brought on 27 December 2024 – Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK Azot v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0680

62024TN0680

December 27, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/929

17.2.2025

Action brought on 27 December 2024 – Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission

(Case T-680/24)

(C/2025/929)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot (Nevinnomyssk, Russia), AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ (Novomoskovsk, Russia) (represented by: P. Vander Schueren, A. Nosowicz and D. Geraets, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

declare the action admissible;

annul the notice of initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States of America (C/2024/5996), (*) as far as it applies to the applicants; and

order the defendant to pay the costs incurred by the applicants in relation to these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant acted contrary to Articles 291 and 297 of the TFEU and Articles 11(2), 11(6) and 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (**) by initiating an expiry review and by extending the validity of antidumping measures by means of the contested notice.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant acted contrary to Articles 5(11) and 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 by failing to provide a copy of the original request and thus by initiating the review without a timely submitted expiry review request.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant did not receive an expiry review request containing ‘sufficient evidence’ and therefore committed manifest errors of assessment, acted in breach of Articles 11(2), 11(5) and 5(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, and violated its duty to examine carefully and impartially all the relevant aspects of the individual case when it initiated the expiry review.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the applicants’ rights of defence and acted in breach of Articles 19(1), 19(2) and 6(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 by treating certain non-confidential information in the consolidated request as confidential and by denying the applicants an opportunity to inspect such non-confidential information as well as, in the alternative, by failing to ensure that non-confidential versions of the annexes concerned permit a reasonable understanding of the substance of the information submitted in confidence.

(*) Notice of initiation of an expiry review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States of America (C/2024/6842) (OJ C, C/2024/5996).

(**) Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/929/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia