EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-460/21: Action brought on 3 August 2021 — MCO (IP) v EUIPO — C8 (C2 CYPRUS CASINOS)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0460

62021TN0460

August 3, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

11.10.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 412/17

(Case T-460/21)

(2021/C 412/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: MCO (IP) Holdings Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: A. Roughton, Barrister-at-law)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: C8 (Issy-les-Moulineaux, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark C2 CYPRUS CASINOS — Application for registration No 17 867 693

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 May 2021 in Case R 908/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision and allow the mark (EUIPO application number 017867693) to proceed to registration;

order EUIPO to bear its own costs;

order C8 to bear its own costs;

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by MCO(IP) Holdings Limited.

Pleas in law

misapplication of the principle of interdependence leading to the incorrect rejection of the sign’s registration;

misapplication of the principle of interdependence leading to the incorrect dismissal of the appeal by the Board of Appeal;

misapplication of the principle of interdependence by upholding the opposition and, in consequence, by incorrectly rejecting the sign’s registration.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia