EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-320/13: Action brought on 13 June 2013 — DelSolar (Wujiang) v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0320

62013TN0320

June 13, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/19

(Case T-320/13)

2013/C 215/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: DelSolar (Wujiang) Ltd (Wujiang City, China) (represented by: L. Catrain González, lawyer, E. Wright and H. Zhu, Barristers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul Commission Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 (1), in so far as it applies to the applicant;

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the European Commission has made a manifest error of law by amplifying the scope of third indent of Article 2(7)(c) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2009 L 343, p. 51) (the ‘Basic Regulation’) and reviewing alleged significant distortions which, because they have not been carried over from the former non-market economy system, they clearly fell outside the scope of the third indent of Article 2(7)(c) of the Basic Regulation.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the European Commission has wrongly concluded that the production costs and overall financial situation of the applicant were subject to significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system as provided in the third indent of the Basic Regulation.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the European Commission has made an error of assessment in light of the fact that neither the negligible subsidies received nor the preferential tax regime received by the applicant and its affiliate Delta Greentech (China) Co. Ltd. (jointly referred as ‘DelSolar Group’) were ‘carried over from the former non-market economy system’.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the decision of the European Commission to reject the applicant's market economy treatment (‘MET’) request on the sole basis of a preferential tax regime and negligible subsidies is disproportionate and unnecessary.

Commission Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 of 4 June 2013 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China and amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2013 making these imports originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China subject to registration (OJ 2013 L 152, p. 5)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia