- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-49/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Rothenberger v EUIPO — Paper Point (ROBOX) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark ROBOX — Earlier EU word mark OROBOX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Independent subcategory of goods — Taking into consideration of a descriptive element — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0049
62020TA0049
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.12.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 433/50
(Case T-49/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark ROBOX - Earlier EU word mark OROBOX - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Independent subcategory of goods - Taking into consideration of a descriptive element - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2020/C 433/63)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Rothenberger AG (Kelkheim, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Sakalaitė-Orlovskienė, J.F. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Paper Point S.n.c di Daria Fabbroni e Simone Borghini (Arezzo, Italy)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2019 (Case R 210/2019-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Paper Point and Rothenberger.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Rothenberger AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.