- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-565/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 26 August 2022 — Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Sofatutor GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0565
62022CN0565
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.11.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 441/12
(Case C-565/22)
(2022/C 441/16)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: Verein für Konsumenteninformation
Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Sofatutor GmbH
Question referred
Must Article 9(1) of Directive 2011/83/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights be interpreted as meaning that the consumer has a new right of withdrawal where a distance contract is ‘extended automatically’ (Article 6(1)(o) of that directive)?
Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).