EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-230/21: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen — Belgium) — X, acting in her own name and as legal representative of her minor children, Y and Z v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 2(f) — Article 10(3)(a) — Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ — Right to family reunification — Refugee minor who is married at the time of her entry into the territory of a Member State — Child marriage not recognised in that Member State — Cohabitation with the spouse lawfully residing in that Member State)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0230

62021CA0230

November 17, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

16.1.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/13

(Case C-230/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Immigration policy - Directive 2003/86/EC - Article 2(f) - Article 10(3)(a) - Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ - Right to family reunification - Refugee minor who is married at the time of her entry into the territory of a Member State - Child marriage not recognised in that Member State - Cohabitation with the spouse lawfully residing in that Member State)

(2023/C 15/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X, acting in her own name and as legal representative of her minor children, Y and Z

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment

Article 10(3)(a) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification, read in conjunction with Article 2(f) of that directive,

must be interpreted as meaning that an unaccompanied refugee minor residing in a Member State does not have to be unmarried in order to acquire the status of sponsor for the purposes of family reunification with his or her first-degree relatives in the direct ascending line.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 263, 5.7.2021.

Language of the case: Dutch

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia