EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 June 2012. # Monica Westeren v European Commission. # Amicable settlement of the proceedings - Article 69(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Agreement between the parties at the initiative of the Tribunal - Removal from the register. # Case F-64/11.

ECLI:EU:F:2012:87

62011FO0064

June 20, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECOND CHAMBER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

20 June 2012 (*)

(Amicable settlement of the proceedings – Article 69(1) of the Rules of Procedure – Agreement between the parties at the initiative of the Tribunal – Removal from the register)

In Case F-64/11,

ACTION brought under Article 270 TFEU, applicable to the EAEC Treaty pursuant to Article 106a thereof,

Monica Westeren, member of the temporary staff of the European Commission, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by S. Crosby and S. Santoro, lawyers,

applicant,

European Commission, represented initially by J. Currall and P. Pecho, and subsequently by J. Currall, acting as Agents,

defendant,

makes the following

1.By application lodged at the Tribunal Registry on 17 June 2011, the applicant seeks annulment of the Commission decision of 4 March 2011, by which the Commission rejected the applicant’s complaint of 12 November 2010 against the Commission decision of 5 October 2010, and compensation for damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of the adoption of that decision.

2.By letter of 14 March 2010, the Judge-Rapporteur, authorised to do so by the Tribunal, put the terms of a possible amicable settlement of the proceedings to the parties. The applicant and the Commission indicated their agreement to the amicable settlement thus proposed in their letters received at the Tribunal Registry on 20 March and 29 March 2012 respectively. By letter received at the Registry on 24 April 2012, the applicant informed the Tribunal of her agreement to the amount of costs to be borne by the defendant and proposed by the latter in its letter of 29 March 2012.

3.Accordingly, the agreement of the parties on the amicable settlement proposed by the Tribunal should be recorded and the present case removed from the register of the Tribunal pursuant to Article 69 of the Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal.

4.Under Article 69(3) of the Rules of Procedure, where there is an agreement between the parties as to costs, a decision as to costs is to be given in accordance with the agreement. The costs shall therefore be borne by the parties in accordance with the terms of their agreement.

On those grounds,

hereby orders:

Luxembourg, 20 June 2012.

Registrar

(*) Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia